| Subject: huh? |
| I‘m not even going to pretend that article made any sense to me for the sake of seeming wise. It seems like one huge paradox, ultimate truth can be found in accepting there is no truth, enlightenment comes from realizing there is no enlightenment? And nonsensical statements and questions are used to answer sensible ones and this somehow leads to enlightenment? I‘d love to be able to wrap my head around what they are trying to say, but it sounds like jibberish to me... |
| Posted by: Chris on 2 Feb. 2012 |
|
| Back to Article |
